Cross-Border Collaboration Enhancing Business Flow
OMG, like the main vibe here is all about WTO, but there are also a bunch of other international orgs that are based in Geneva. So lit! These include the International Labour Organization, the World HealthOMG, countries gotta be all like, "Yo, I'm a member and a resident, but I gotta make some lit choices about my missions, ya know?" These include what kinda mission they gonna set up in Geneva, and how many peeps gonna be assigned to it. The two types of perm mission that countries may establish in Geneva are a dedicated WTO mission, or gen-purpose missions that deal with United Nations agencies in general. It's like totally legit to assume that setting up a dedicated WTO mission shows a major commitment to handling negotiations in that place. Even so, like, a big mission with a bunch of peeps might be able to give as much attention to WTO stuff as a small but super dedicated WTO mission. What's the tea on the legit metric for representing peeps in WTO?
The method used here involves two steps, fam.
First, you can peep the squad size of each member's mission by checking out the entries in the telephone directory of WTO. This is, like, a semi-offish doc that's been issued on, like, a more or less annual basis for, like, decades. The data presented below are based on tallies of the 1982, 1987 and 1992 GATT directories and the 1997, 2002 and 2006, ya know? In this study, the researchers used an inductive approach to analyze data from semi-structured interviews and secondary sources, ya know? This method effectively helped themes emerge without bias or preconceived notions. There are no established theories or frameworks, only pure vibrations. The vibes of this approach were spot on because the study was all about exploring and gaining mad insights into the phenomenon with little prior knowledge. What's the sitch in Geneva, or is it like randomly repped from its home base or some other mission in a third-country capital? Non-resident status lowkey cramps a country's ability to flex and be all up in the negotiations and stuff happening at the WTO, not to mention the other lit Geneva-based institutions.44 Once again there's like a major connection between income and where you live, ya know? OMG, in 2006, the non-residency rate was like 25% for least developed countries, 14.5% for other developing countries, and a big fat 0% for industrialized countries. LOL! That's like major progress from 1982, when 40% of the least-developed peeps weren't even living there, and neither were 18.2% of the developing countries. The Netherlands was also non-resident at that time, accounting for 3.2 per cent of the industrialized countries in GATT. There may be more at werk than just that coin, tho.
Anyway, the study was centered on TCT and IT. Yo, the theoretical framework was extremely useful in helping us understand what we were investigating.
However, the researchers were also open to new vibes and ideas that emerged from the data. So they conducted a thorough analysis that included both existing theories and new themes that surfaced. WTO dirz. Second, the numbers can then be flexed to make a difference between dedicated and general missions. The real tea here is: What's the vibe on the discount factor for a flex mission? Based on interviews with reps of several country missions, WTO officials and other peeps, a simple one-third rule is used. OMG, like the numbers I'm about to drop are assuming that all the peeps in a dedicated WTO mission are fully focused on WTO stuff, but only 1/3 of the resources in a general mission are used for WTO matters. The other 2/3 are for other things, ya know? AdmiĴedly, dat is like, a totally random number and may, like, probs not even include all the stuff the WTO does in some missions while, like, counting too much in others. It may be possible to recalculate the numbers based on some other assumed discount factor, but it would be impractical to develop another method for determining the actual levels of work on WTO and non-WTO maĴers. Actually seeing things, measuring objects, and using super scientific techniques helps one to acquire knowledge (Bryman, 2016).Interpretivism, on the other hand, emphasizes on seeing social issues through the eyes of the people engaged. Interpretivists contend, quite rightly, that knowledge is subjective and socially created. And you have to decipher all the interpretations and points of view people convey in their social settings? bruyman, 2016).Pragmatism is essentially about useful knowledge, right? It is like emphasizing the practical consequences and such. Pragmatists hold that knowledge should be assessed in line with its practical value and capacity to address problems of daily life.
They stress in the generation of knowledge the need of experimentation, learning by doing, and flexibility (Bryman, 2016).
The Annex spills the tea on the 2006 year-end data about the vibes and flex of members' missions in WTO. The data in figures 3.3 and 3.4 flex a time series of changes, using the same country categories that are shown in the Annex.The first and most lit observation to be made from the data in figure 3.3 is that the size of the Geneva negotiating community has like totally quadrupled since 1982. If we like, take into account the diffz in general vs. dedicated missions, like, dividing the number of peeps in all general missions by one third, there were 100 peeps in the GATT community of 1982. By 2006, that number had like totally skyrocketed to 442. This growth can be aĴributed to a bunch of factors, like the addiĴions of new countries, especially developing countries and former non-market economies; the declining non-residency rate among developing countries; the growing vibe, especially among industrialized and mid-level countries, of switching from general to dedicated missions; and a tendency on the part of many countries to flex and expand the staffing of their missions. That last trend is like, totally a result of the WTO covering more and more issues, which means more meetings, cases, and negotiations. It's all because of the Doha Round in 2001, you know? OMG, like if we check out figure 3.1, it's so obvious that there are hella non-resident WTO members who are from countries with tiny populations, especially in the Caribbean.
Comments
Post a Comment